Home » Featured » Demonising Probashis won’t contain coronavirus in Bangladesh
Preparing for Coronavirus in Bangladesh

Demonising Probashis won’t contain coronavirus in Bangladesh

Najrul Khasru

Demonising Probashis has damaged Bangladesh’s efforts to contain coronavirus and more explains NAJRUL KHASRU.

ON 14th MARCH a group of Probashis, arriving from Italy were transferred to a local facility to go through the Government‘s newly initiated coronavirus screening procedures. At one point they started shouting and screaming – some incoherently, others complaining about the lack of food and water, the uncomfortable environment and the inordinate delay in carrying out the procedures. Many felt the screening was unnecessary as they had undergone similar procedures in Rome and Dubai – with negative results.

The police appeared to handle the situation superbly, managing to calm the group and persuade them to co-operate with the authorities. Thereafter, the appropriate procedures were carried out without any further incidents. The matter should have ended there… but it did not.

State Minister for Health Mr Zahed Maleque

Within hours, the Foreign Minister Dr Abdul Momen decided to speak, expressing his strong displeasure at the behaviour of the group and holding Probashis responsible for “importing” coronavirus to Bangladesh. He then added that Probashis behave like “nobabzadas” whenever they come to Bangladesh. A few days later the State Minister for Health, Mr Zahed Maleque, told the press that a Probashi from Italy had come to Bangladesh and then returned to Italy after transmitting coronavirus to his own mother.

Bangladesh is one of the very few countries where coronavirus still appears to be at the containment stage. Nevertheless, Bangladesh, being a part of the global village, has had tens of thousands of people arriving into its territories in the last three months through land, air and sea and from various locations. The arrivals include Probashis, foreign nationals, sailors, businesspeople, government officials, travellers and so on. Any one of them could unsuspectingly carry the virus and transmit it to others. Some might even have left the country after unwittingly transmitting it to locals. It is impossible to know how and when the virus was transmitted in Bangladesh as many carriers remain asymptomatic while spreading the virus.

Therefore, if or when coronavirus does spread in Bangladesh it could be for numerous reasons and from numerous sources – some identified, others not. In these circumstances using words such as “importing” and pointing a finger at Probashis was neither wise nor factually correct.  In the same breath mocking the Probashis, such as suggesting they behave like “nababzadas” whenever they are in Bangladesh, was not only deeply offensive but also, as it transpires, designed to provoke hatred.

Foreign Minister Dr Abdul Momen

Instead of reflecting on his ill-judged remarks, the Foreign Minister Dr Abdul Momen decided to raise the stakes even higher. On 21st March he announced that the dead bodies of Probashis, particularly those who had died abroad of Covid-19, a disease caused by the coronavirus, should not be sent to Bangladesh for burial. This was a bewilderingly breath taking announcement.

By then the WHO’s guidance on disposing of such dead bodies was well known, and governments were burying or cremating the deceased following strict public safety measures. These allowed the departed very little contact from their own families, let alone allowing them to go through the country’s air cargo procedures to be shipped abroad. The Foreign Minister would have known that. If he still had concerns, he could have discreetly notified his Missions abroad and they would have taken care of the matter in a dignified way. It must be said that his announcement was not only unnecessary, it was devoid of any human empathy, and it contained an element of callus disrespect for the dead.

Once the Foreign Minister had publicly made it clear that no Probashis, dead or alive, were welcome in Bangladesh, the demonising process was complete. From then on Probashis in Bangladesh became fair game.

There was immediate backlash against Probashis on social media. This was followed by numerous reported incidents of threats, verbal abuse and physical aggression on Probashis all over the country. They were mocked, abused and spat at. Their properties were vandalised.

There are a number of credible accounts of corrupt elements in the police extracting money from Probashis using the threat of torture on the alleged grounds that the Probashi person did not obey the Government’s instructions to stay at home in quarantine. A TV channel reported once incident of such threat being made by the police to the family of a Probashi who lives in France and who is not only not in Bangladesh now, but has not been there for many years.

There have been instances of red flags being hoisted to identify where Probashis live – not dissimilar to the way the fascist thugs were going around identifying Jewish properties in Nazi Germany. There have also been reliable reports of patients dying due to hospitals refusing to treat them simply because they are Probashis, even though they are not exhibiting any symptoms of coronavirus.

This Probashi-bashing campaign has no doubt harmed Bangladesh’s efforts to contain coronavirus. The Government’s clear instructions to all citizens to stay at home, frequently wash their hands and maintain social distancing were clouded by the erroneous perception held by many that the Probashis were the carriers and spreaders of the virus. It was popularly believed that only if they were forced out of circulation could everyone else could continue to lead a near normal life.

Hence, rather than adhering to the Government’s instructions to the letter, many people were involved in the anti-Probashi atrocities described above. Many shops and buildings put up signs and instructed security guards not to allow any Probashis in. The more effective course of action – the proper thing, as practised in many countries – would have been to deny entry to anyone who had any recognised symptoms of coronavirus, regardless of who they are.

A verified account of a Probashi who returned to England a week or so ago tells an astonishing story. He had arrived in Bangladesh in January 2020 and in early March started a coronavirus awareness campaign in his locality which included advice for people to do their prayers at home rather than at the mosque to avoid congregation. This angered some locals.

One evening a group of 20 of them marched to his house to tell him that he had coronavirus and therefore he must stay at home at all times or return to England.  He pledged to return to England. In his own words: “As soon as I said that, they became euphoric and started shaking hands and hugging each other. I knew that if any one of them had the virus then their behaviour was putting them all at risk. But I was too scared to say that because they would have beaten me up.”

Prime Minister Sheik Hasina leads government policy on Coronavirus.

The extent of the damage this distraction has caused to the Government’s containment effort is likely to crystallise in the next few weeks. Furthermore, this demonising of Probashis has come at a time when many of the nine million so called remittance fighters are going through an unimaginable level of anxiety and hardship all over the world. Many – alone, without families or resources in coronavirus hotspots around the world – are in daily fear of hunger and death. Reports are now coming in on hourly basis of deaths of Probashis in Europe, the Middle East, America and other parts of the world, some in the most heart-breaking, loneliest and horrific of circumstances.

No word of empathy, compassion or gestures of human kindness have been shown towards them by the Bangladesh Authorities, who have instead make it clear that they are not wanted in Bangladesh, dead or alive. The Prime Minister Sheik Hasina, addressing the nation on 25th March and 5th April 2020 on the coronavirus pandemic, made no mention of the Probashis – let alone including them or their families in her $8.5 billion stimulus package.

These people were hailed as heroes and remittance fighters in good times. If they now feel they have been jettisoned by their own country at the first sign of a crisis, would they be so wrong?

Najrul Khasru is a British Bangladeshi barrister and a part-time tribunal judge in England.

Read more about it:
Will Bangladeshis unite behind on candidate?
Local elections in Bangladesh: democracy missing

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *