The Engage Podcast was started in mid-January of 2011 and since then the team has produced and recorded a total of 39 episodes (excluding the Promo). Last June the team was invited to do a Fan Panel at Destination Star Trek 3.<\/p>\n
The team is comprised of three members.<\/p>\n
\u2022<\/strong><\/span>Simon Cordell<\/strong> – Executive Producer and Host for the podcast has been a fan of the franchise for over 15 years and has accumulated a wide and varied knowledge of the franchise as a whole. He knows more random bits of trivia than is humanly possible! [Surely not as many as you, Emdad \u2013 Ed.]\n \u2022<\/span><\/strong>Then there\u2019s Jamie Marks<\/strong> – Producer and Host who has been on an \u201cadventure\u201d of his own over the past few years. Jamie finds coming up with ideas has become easier. This is due to his expanding knowledge gained from reading extra material on the franchise in books, magazines and some comics.<\/p>\n \u2022<\/span>Philip Tuck<\/strong> – Producer and Host was drawn to the franchise by the latest films, which he does not stop going on about. Unfortunately, he keeps comparing anything else he sees to it! However, there is some hope for him yet, as he has started watching and enjoying Star Trek: The Next Generation. His opinions on many topics and episodes have led to his own section of the show, and after a lot of discussion it was named \u201cStrange New Worlds\u201d. This covers the topics and questions new fans might have about the series.<\/p>\n With all this knowledge on offer it was only appropriate that we popped over to tap in.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n 1.\u00a0 Just how big is the Star Trek franchise? 2.\u00a0 Who are your favourite characters and why? 3.\u00a0 What is Captain James T. Kirk’s middle name? 4.\u00a0 Why did Gene Roddenberry create the transporter? 5.\u00a0 Is it true that the classic line “Beam me up, Scotty” was never actually delivered? 6. Why did TV bosses at first reject Leonard Nimoy’s Spock character? 7a.Why did Roddenberry want the Enterprise to fly upside down? 7b.Where did the Original Series Enterprise get its design from? 8.\u00a0 Apart from the obvious, are there perks for fans? 9.\u00a0 Where did the line “to boldly go where no man has gone before” originate from? 10.\u00a0 Why did Spock commonly resort to the Vulcan Nerve Pinch? 11.\u00a0 How did the Klingon language come across? 12.\u00a0 Why do the Star Trek: The Original Series Klingons look different from the Star Trek: The Motion Picture Klingons, seen in later series and films? 13.\u00a0 What was unique about Khan’s men in Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan? 14.\u00a0 Were Borg robots initially meant to be Borg bugs? 15.\u00a0 I‘ve read somewhere that during the filming of Star Trek<\/em> (2009)<\/em> Zachary Quinto couldn\u2019t manage to properly do the Vulcan salute? 16<\/strong>.\u00a0 I’ve heard the Gene Roddenberry was a cop? 17.\u00a0 Who is Lucy, or Lucille Ball to use her full name? 18. I understand that Eddie Murphy wanted a starring role in Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home<\/em>. 19.\u00a0 Can you tell me a little about Professor Stephen Hawking\u2019s place in Star Trek folklore? 20.\u00a0 What is the story about Patrick Stewart’s confidence in Star Trek: The Next Generation? 21.\u00a0 Was Leonard Nimoy’s father a barber? Emdad Rahman The Engage Podcast was started in mid-January of 2011 and since then the team has produced and recorded a total of 39 episodes (excluding the Promo). Last June the team was invited to do a Fan Panel at Destination Star Trek 3. The team is comprised of three members. \u2022Simon Cordell – Executive …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":3871,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3870","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-english"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"yoast_head":"\n
\n<\/strong>The franchise is more than just big, it\u2019s massive\u2026 as it is stretched over two universes!
\nThe first is what is now considered to be the \u201cPrime Universe\u201d. This is the universe we\u2019ve had from 1966 (Star Trek: The Original Series) right through to 2005 (Star Trek: Enterprise). That\u2019s including the other four series and ten feature films \u2013 which in themselves are broken up into six Star Trek: The Original Series films and four Star Trek: The Next Generation films.
\nThe second is the universe produced by JJ Abrams, which I\u2019ve nicknamed the \u201cAbramverse\u201d. This universe has only been going for six years, and is (currently) made up of two films. The first is Star Trek<\/em>, released back in 2009, and the second is Star Trek Into Darkness<\/em>, released in 2013. This smaller scale makes it a good place to start for new fans of the franchise\u2026 before they venture into the Prime Universe.
\nSome old school fans consider the Prime Universe (and the shows and films within it) to be \u201cpure\u201d Star Trek. The Abramsverse doesn\u2019t deal with what I like to call \u201cthe three \u2018M\u2019s\u201d (morals, messages and meanings).\u00a0 What I mean is that there\u2019s (currently) no way for the Abramsverse to comment on contemporary issues\u2026 as there is no series (at the moment) to do that!<\/p>\n
\n<\/strong>Favourite characters (and role models) are Captain Picard and Command Riker (both in Star Trek: The Next Generation<\/em>). We\u2019ve chosen Captain Jean-Luc Picard because he instils all the good qualities in the franchise. He\u2019s a strong role model who\u2019s honest, kind, fair, and objective\u2026but most important of all has a moral compass.
\nAnother choice is Command William Riker as he is just an incredibly great guy! As he loves playing jazz on his trombone, he\u2019s liked by everyone and is like a big brother\u2026 as he can give you advice on the ladies!<\/p>\n
\n<\/strong>Captain Kirk\u2019s middle name is Tiberius\u2026 but what is not known so well is that it wasn\u2019t mentioned first in Star Trek: The Original Series. We actually found it out in Star Trek: The Animated Series. Also in the Original Series episode \u201cWhere No Man Has Gone Before\u201d Kirk\u2019s gravestone is wrong as it says James R Kirk<\/p>\n
\n<\/strong>It was an easier (and cheaper) way of getting the Enterprise crew members onto a planet’s surface, rather than landing the ship on the planet. That would waste time. Transporting them down would mean that they could concentrate more on telling the story.<\/p>\n
\n<\/strong>Believe it or not, it is true that this phase was never actually said on Star Trek: The Original Series. As times gone by it has become a kind of television urban legend.<\/p>\n
\n<\/strong>The bosses at NBC thought that the Vulcan First Officer Spock would appear too much like the devil and worried that it would \u201cwould scare the sh*t out of every kid in America\u201d \u2013 forcing the publicity shots to be altered.<\/p>\n
\n<\/strong>Good question, Emdad \u2013 a question we don\u2019t know the answer to\u2026 but we would speculate that it was done that way\u2026 so that the model wasn\u2019t broken due to the strain. There\u2019s also a possibility that it was done to make it easier to film. It is well known that instead of moving the model for filming, they move the camera around the model instead – which is simple but effective!<\/p>\n
\n<\/strong>The original design came from the show\u2019s designer (Matt Jefferies) and the series creator Gene Roddenberry. As Science Fiction starships at the time were either flying saucers or rockets, to make Star Trek stand out they decided to combine the two\u2026 creating the design you see today!<\/p>\n
\n<\/strong>Being a \u201cTrekkie\u201d is great! You get to join a fantastic community of people, who are friendly and outgoing\u2026 Everyone respects each other\u2019s opinions (even though they may disagree). The Kirk\/Picard debate is a prime example of that at play!
\nWe also believe that people in general have enjoyed the perks of Star Trek (and science fiction in general). Many of the technological advances we appreciate have their origins from people inspired by what they\u2019ve seen on a science fiction show like Star Trek!!!<\/p>\n
\n<\/strong>It was originally taken from a White House booklet (at the height of the Cold War and space race) on space issued after the Sputnik flight in 1957. The writer of the second pilot (“Where No Man Has Gone Before”) of The Original Series used the quotation. After several episodes, and much deliberation (and revisions) by Gene Roddenberry and the show\u2019s producers, they decided upon the infamous words.<\/p>\n
\n<\/strong>It was conceived of by Leonard Nimoy so that Spock could overpower adversaries without resorting to violence. The Vulcan Salute is another one of Leonard Nimoy\u2019s suggestions to build an identity for the Vulcan species \u2013 so that you could differentiate the Vulcan people from a different race.<\/p>\n
\n<\/strong>The Klingon language was first developed by James Doohan (Star Trek\u2019s Scotty). He devised the language\u2019s basic sound and the first few words and phrases for the Original Series. By the time you get to the first film (Star Trek: The Motion Picture), the job had been given to\u00a0Marc Okrand, who is responsible for the modern Klingon language.<\/p>\n
\n<\/strong>The real reason that the Klingons changed between is the Star Trek: The Original Series and the later television series and films is because they had a better makeup budget. But the show itself has dealt with the issue coming up with a couple of canon reasons for the change.
\n\u2022<\/strong><\/span>The first comes from Star Trek: Deep Space Nine when the crew returned to the 23rd century in the episode “Trials and Tribble-ations\u201d. Where Worf (a Klingon) acknowledges the difference in appearance, he offers no explanation. He just says, “We do not discuss it with outsiders.”
\n\u2022<\/strong><\/span>The second explanation comes from Star Trek: Enterprise, and a two-part storyline (episodes \u201cAffliction\u201d and \u201cDivergence”) that aired in February 2005. \u00a0As the Klingons attempt to replicate Terran (human) experiments to create augmented soldiers, the Klingon scientists used genetic material from human test subjects on their own people. This resulted in a viral\u00a0pandemic which caused Klingons to develop human-like physical characteristics. Doctor Phlox (Enterprise\u2019s Doctor) manages to formulate a cure for the virus\u2026 but the physical alterations remained in the populace and were inherited by their offspring. Phlox indicated that “someday” the physical alterations could be reversed.<\/p>\n
\n<\/strong>You\u2019ve lost me Emdad. I\u2019ve seen that film so many times\u2026 but I didn\u2019t know there was anything special to do with Khan\u2019s men.\u00a0 (They were all Chippendale bouncers).<\/p>\n
\n<\/strong>Interesting, Emdad \u2013 I didn\u2019t know that\u2026 but I\u2019ve got to point out to you that the Borg aren\u2019t robots. They are actually cyborgs. They are in fact humans who have been augmented with cybernetic enhancements. But it wouldn\u2019t surprise me, as the Borg we go on to see have a \u201chive mind\u201d much like an insect colony, backing up your original question. A good bit of research, Emdad!<\/p>\n
\n<\/strong>Yes, after the release of Star Trek 2009<\/em> the news came out that Zachary Quinto couldn\u2019t hold his finger together for his scene with Leonard Nimoy (\u201cPrime\u201d Spock). So after exhaustive attempts to do it naturally, JJ Abrams had to eventually glue his fingers together in order to get the scene shot.<\/p>\n
\n<\/strong>That\u2019s right, Gene Roddenberry was a police officer for the Los Angeles Police Department. While he was doing that he was also a part-time freelance scriptwriter. From his daytime job he witnessed the darker sides to humanity. This got him thinking about doing a show set in the future (at the height of the space race and Cold War) where all the world\u2019s problems were solved and we lived in a utopian society \u2013 a world without war, without hunger, without disease and without poverty. This idea grew into the Star Trek we know and love!<\/p>\n
\n<\/strong>Good question I don\u2019t know the answer to\u2026 as I\u2019ve never heard of her name relating to Star Trek before!<\/p>\n
\n<\/strong>Emdad, this is the first I\u2019ve heard of it! (Yes, and he has regretted it since.)<\/p>\n
\n<\/strong>Professor Stephen Hawking is a massive Star Trek fan so he wanted to appear on the show. He guest starred on an Episode of Star Trek: The Next Generation,<\/em> where he plays a holographic version of himself. He\u2019s playing a game of poker with Albert Einstein, Sir Isaac Newton and Starfleet\u2019s own Lieutenant Commander Data (who happens to be an android). While he was on set, Professor Stephen Hawking also sat in the Captain\u2019s Chair!<\/p>\n
\n<\/strong>When Star Trek: The Next Generation was in pre-production there was a lot of speculation that it was going to be a big flop\u2026 as surely Gene Roddenberry couldn\u2019t \u201clightning can strike twice\u201d after his success with Star Trek: The Original series. So you can imagine Patrick Stewart already quite sceptical. To make matters worse, once he arrived in the USA the Los Angeles Times called him an \u201cunknown British Shakespearean actor\u201d.<\/p>\n
\n<\/strong>Emdad, something I\u2019ve never heard about! (He specialised in giving his patrons a \u201cSpock Cut.\u201d)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"